Florida slip-and-fall claims: proving notice
For a Florida slip and fall involving a transitory foreign substance in a business, section 768.0755 requires proof that the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition and should have acted to remedy it.
The hazard alone is not the entire case.
Florida Statutes section 768.0755 applies when someone slips on a transitory foreign substance in a business establishment. In addition to proving the dangerous condition and resulting harm, the injured person must prove that the business actually knew or legally should have known about the condition and should have taken corrective action.
Constructive knowledge has two statutory paths.
Constructive knowledge may be shown with circumstantial evidence that the condition existed long enough that the business should have discovered it through ordinary care. It may also be shown by evidence that the condition occurred with such regularity that it was foreseeable. The appearance of the substance, witness observations, prior occurrences, and inspection timing may become important.
Preserve details before they disappear.
Photograph the substance, the surrounding floor, warning signs, lighting, and your injuries. Save your shoes, receipt, incident report, witness information, and medical records. Note the exact time and location and identify employees who responded. Surveillance footage and inspection or cleaning records may be time-sensitive, so discuss preservation promptly.
Fault and filing time require separate review.
Section 768.81 generally reduces damages in proportion to a claimant’s share of fault and bars recovery in an applicable negligence action when the claimant is found more than 50% at fault. Section 95.11 generally provides two years to commence a negligence action. Accrual, exceptions, defendants, and other pre-suit requirements can change the analysis, so do not calendar a deadline from this general rule alone.
Common questions
What is a transitory foreign substance?
The statute addresses temporary substances in a business setting. Depending on the facts, examples may include a spill, dropped food, or tracked-in water. The source, duration, location, and recurring nature of the condition all may matter.
Must an employee admit seeing the hazard?
No. Section 768.0755 permits proof of actual or constructive knowledge. Constructive knowledge may be established through the condition’s duration or evidence that it occurred regularly and was foreseeable.
Can a claim be investigated without a photograph?
Yes, but photographs can be valuable. Witnesses, video, incident records, inspection logs, medical documentation, and testimony may also matter. Preserve what is available and identify missing evidence promptly.
Official sources
General information, not legal advice. Laws and deadlines depend on your circumstances.
Talk with FK Law Group, LLP